Logo Logo Logo Logo
  • About
    • The conferences
    • The ICSP 14th Edition
  • Commitees
  • Covered Topics
    • Plenary Lectures
    • Abstracts
    • ISBN
  • Photo Galleries
  • Contacts
  • About

    • The conferences
    • The ICSP 14th Edition
  • Commitees
  • Covered Topics

    • Plenary Lectures
    • Abstracts
    • ISBN
  • Photo Galleries
  • Contacts

Abstract [82]

14th International Conference on Shot Peening

Effect of surface treatment on the fatigue strength of additive manufactured Ti6Al4V alloy

Carlos Navarro, Jesús Vázquez, Jaime Domínguez

University of Seville, Spain

cnp@us.es; jesusvaleo@us.es; jaime@us.es

b Okinawa College, National Institute of Technology, 905 Henoko Nago, Okinawa, Japan

masaki-k@okinawa-ct.ac.jp

Antonio Periñán, Marta Herrera García, Fernando Lasagni

Advanced Center for Aerospace Technologies (CATEC), Seville, Spain aperinan@catec.aero; mherrera@catec.aero; flasagni@catec.aero

Simon Bernarding, Sebastian Slawik, Frank Mücklich

University of Saarlandes bernarding.simon@gmail.com; s.slawik@mx.uni-saarland.de; muecke@matsci.uni-sb.de

Francisco Boby, Lloyd Hackelc

Curtiss Wright Surface Technologies, Metal Improvement Company, Seville, Spain Francisco.Boby@cwst.com

Abstract

Different alloys can be used for Additive Manufacturing (AM) with good structural strength. Among the titanium alloys, Ti6Al4V is the most used, especially for aerospace applications. There have been many analyses of the mechanical properties of additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V with very good static strength results in general. However, there are still some difficulties to get fatigue properties close enough to the ones of specimens manufactured using traditional processes. Considering the high effect of surface roughness on the fatigue strength of AM specimens, this work deals with the effect produced by some surface treatments on the fatigue properties. Five treatments have been used for comparison. All specimens were annealed previously to reduce residual stresses, as well as sand blasted to reduce the roughness. The treatments considered are: 1) no treatment after annealing and sand blasting; 2) shot peening; 3) shot peening plus Chemical Assisted Surface Enhancement (CASE); 4) laser shock peening, and 5) HIP. After fatigue testing, a comparison of the results has been carried out. It was found that laser peening produced the best results, followed by shot peening plus CASE and shot peening, with the lowest strength produced by HIP as well as just sand blasting after thermal treatment.

request paper

Date

17 Novembre 2022

ABOUT

  • THE CONFERENCES
  • THE 14th EDITION

COVERED TOPICS

  • PLENARY LECTURES
  • ABSTRACTS

CONTACTS

Politecnico di Milano Campus Bovisa Sud

via La Masa 1, 20156 Milano, Italy

Phone: +39 02 23998212

email: info@icsp14.org

ORGANIZED BY: Politecnico di Milano Campus Bovisa Sud, Via La Masa 1, 20156 Milano, Italy - P.IVA 04376620151 - www.polimi.it
IN COLLABORATION WITH: Peen Service Srl, Via Pollastri 7, 40138 Bologna, Italy - PIVA: 02082361201 - www.peenservice.it
Credits | Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy | Cookie preferences